The foreign Ministry of Ukraine told about further action in the court of the UN
Now Kiev will focus on the direct proof of guilt Russia.
He welcomed the ruling of the International court of justice in the Hague interim solution on the lawsuit against Russia. This was during the briefing said the representative of Ukraine in this court, the Deputy foreign Minister Elena zerkal.
“They were all afraid that will not be accepted jurisdiction, particularly under the Convention on financing of terrorism. The court recognized that it is, the court recognized the existence of violations, the court even acknowledged that the existence of this dispute does not preclude the Minsk process, and that the parties can continue the Minsk process and the trial as a parallel obligation, and no one imitated,” – said zerkal.
She noted that for Ukraine this decision is “really positive,” especially considering that “the Russians asked at all to distract our demands and not to make decisions”.
“For us it is really a victory,” – said zerkal.
According to her, the first step was important to prove the previous jurisdiction, the next – Kiev will focus on the direct proof of guilt Russia. Have serilizable Cho such evidence Ukraine has enough.
The UN international court will determine the date of commencement of consideration of the claim of Ukraine against Russia, in fact in may. This was during the briefing, which was broadcast channel “112 Ukraine”, said the representative of Ukraine to the International court of justice, Deputy foreign Minister of Ukraine Olena zerkal.
“We are entering the next stage. The next stage – consideration of the merits. In may we will meet here (in the International court of justice – ed.) the parties in order for the court to determine what will be the schedule of the proceedings, in fact”, she said.
As reported Корреспондент.neton 19 April, the international court of justice in the Hague issued an interim decision on the claim of Ukraine against Russia.
In particular, insufficient evidence of Ukraine on financing Russia terrorism. The court decided that the conditions that are necessary to identify additional measures regarding the rights that are violated in Ukraine on the basis of the Convention for the suppression of the financing of terrorism do not meet the requirements.
The court granted the request of Ukraine on temporary measures concerning a claim against Russia under the Convention on the elimination of racial discrimination.
The court also called for the preservation of the Crimean Tatars the right to establish own institutions and requirement of Russia to resume the work of Parliament.
Russia should also ensure that the use of the Ukrainian language in the educational system of the Crimea.