Mall “Gulliver” is working normally, the search is conducted in the business centre

ТРЦ "Гулливер" работает в обычном режиме, обыск проводится в бизнес-центре

Shopping and entertainment complex “Gulliver” is now working normally. Search SBU holds in the business centre, which is housed in the same building. About this “Ukrainian news” said the head of the Department of public relations of the shopping center Tatiana Atajanova.

“The SBU conducts searches in 3rd, 4th and 27th floors of the business center “Gulliver”. Shopping Mall is in normal mode. We now have nearly 30 thousand visitors,” she said.

According to her, from 8:00 to 9:20 SBU is not allowed only in the business center, but after that, searches were continued only on the above floors.

Earlier in the SBU said that the staff of intelligence service carried out a search in the shopping center “Gulliver”. It was reported that the search is connected with investigation of the case of embezzlement of funds of the Bank, “Michael”. The staff of “Gulliver” in the morning reported that the entrance to the office center was blocked and people can’t get to work.

News on topic: In the Mall “Gulliver” is being searched in the case of embezzlement of funds of the Bank, “Michael”, – SBU

In the SBU said that the entrance to Gulliver blocked no law enforcement, and administration of the SEC.

We will remind, the Shevchenkovsky district court on 14 November 2016, has seized a shopping and entertainment center Gulliver on Sportyvna square, 1, Kyiv. It was explained that the arrest was effected in the investigation of the production of embezzlement of funds of the Bank, “Michael”. It was reported that “Gulliver” and the Bank “Michael” are owned by Viktor Polishchuk. In particular 100% of the Bank “Michael” owned by “Acasian”, 92.5% of which, in turn, is owned Polishchuk.

For its part, the head of communications Gulliver Tatiana Atajanova said that the owner of such complex, LLC “Tri O”, is irrelevant to the Bank “Michael” and “Easypano” and therefore the arrest of the shopping center violates the right of ownership, which will protect.